Local Weather

Current conditions for Troutdale as of Wed, 04 Mar 2015 1:53 am PST



High: 66° Low: 42°


Feels like: 36 °F

Barometer: 30.25 in and rising

Humidity: 73%

Visibility: 10 mi

Dewpoint: 42 °F

Wind: 3 mph

Sunrise: 6:41 am

Sunset: 6:00 pm

Powered by Yahoo! Weather


GD Star Rating

Historic! UN Climate Clown Conference Sets Record for Largest Carbon Footprint

limasource: JWF – Posted by Jammie on Dec 09, 2014 at 2:30 pm

Can’t these douchebags just do a WebEx in lieu of flying off to some exotic locale? Just asking for a friend.

The current U.N. climate talks will be the first to neutralize all the greenhouse gas pollution they generate, offset by host country Peru’s protection of forest at three different reserves, organizers say.

Now the bad news: The Lima conference is expected to have the biggest carbon footprint of any U.N. climate meeting measured to date.

At more than 50,000 metric tons of carfb/phbon dioxide, the negotiations’ burden on global warming will be about 1 1/2 times the norm, said Jorge Alvarez, project coordinator for the U.N. Development Program.

The venue is one big reason. It had to be built.

No, it didn’t. This is a massive scam and we all know it.

Continue reading “Historic! UN Climate Clown Conference Sets Record for Largest Carbon Footprint” »

GD Star Rating

NOAA Playing Fast and Loose with the Rules

Their claim that it was the hottest October on record is “a sham.”

When asked about NOAA’s assertion that last month was the hottest October on record, meteorologist Joe Bastardi points out that plenty of temperature indicators, including satellite records, show no such thing.

According to NOAA’s own data, it was only the 7th or 8th warmest October in the last 30 years.

GD Star Rating

Al Gore leaves climate march in Chevy Suburban

GD Star Rating

What else did the ’97% of scientists’ say?

consensus-on-the-consensus1source: WattsUpWithThat

Guest Post by Barry Woods

I wonder just how many politicians, environmentalists or scientists who use the phrase ’97% of scientists’ (or those who more carefully use ‘active climate scientists’) to give weight to their arguments regarding climate change to the public, have any idea of the actual source of this soundbite.  

Perhaps a few may say the ‘Doran Survey’, which is the one of the most common references for this ’97% of active climate scientists’ phrase. In fact, the Doran EoS paper merely cites a MSc thesis for the actual source of this 97% figure and the actual survey.

“This was a very simplistic and biased questionnaire.”

(‘Doran Survey’ participant)

In a world where politicians (UK) went to war in Iraq based on a ‘sexed’ up dodgy dossier plagiarised from a 12 year old PhD thesis. I wonder how confident they would be lecturing the public about the need for radical decarbonising economic climate polices, if they were aware that the ’97% of active climate scientists’ quote/soundbite actually comes from a students MSc thesis, that the Doran EoS paper cites?

Here are but just a few of many responses from scientists that actually took part in the survey, taken from the appendi of the MSc thesis:

Continue reading “What else did the ’97% of scientists’ say?” »

GD Star Rating

Coldest Year On Record So Far In The US


GD Star Rating

Climate change is meaningless: Former NASA scientist

climate-changesource: DDN

In a surprising development, a former NASA scientist on Monday described global warming as “nonsense” saying that it is “absolutely stupid” to blame human activity for the recent floods in the UK.

“It’s absolutely stupid to blame floods on climate change, as I read the Prime Minister did recently. I don’t blame the politicians in this case, however, I blame his so-called scientific advisors,” Professor Leslie Woodcock said.

“Events can happen with frequencies on all time scales in the physics of a chaotic system such as the weather. Any point on lowland can flood up to a certain level on all time scales from one month to millions of years and it’s completely unpredictable beyond around five days,” he added.

Professor Les Woodcock also said there is “no reproducible evidence” to prove that carbon dioxide levels have increased over the past century and slammed the green movement for misleading the people and inflicting economic damage on ordinary people.

Continue reading “Climate change is meaningless: Former NASA scientist” »

GD Star Rating

3 reasons why ‘global warming’ has fizzled: Expert

GD Star Rating

John Kerry’s Climate McCarthyism Demeans Science

Spectator Cover Artsource: Forbes

If you put John Kerry, Barack Obama and Tom Steyer in a room together, you would still yet to have a single scientist there. Even so, the three are hypocritically leading a campaign to demonize climate scientists at NASA, NOAA, Harvard, MIT, Princeton, Columbia, etc., because the three political kingpins don’t agree with the scientists’ conclusions about global warming. Kerry put this climate McCarthyism in the spotlight this week when he called the scientists at the above prestigious institutions “shoddy scientists” and members “of the Flat Earth Society.” Sorry, John, but ramping up personal attacks against scientists who disagree with you does nothing to hide the fact that your alleged climate consensus is nothing more than a self-delusional myth.

If scientific truths were determined merely by a show of hands, and if people expressing dissenting scientific views had always been blackballed from expressing their views to the public, people would indeed still believe the world is flat. Fortunately for science, and unfortunately for Kerry, the Scientific Method encourages rather than blackballs critical inquiry and scientific debate. Kerry, Obama and Steyer may seek to employ climate McCarthyism to silence scientific inquiry, but neither scientists nor the public are being fooled by their heavy-handedness and mean-spirited personal attacks.

This Is Alarmist Consensus?

Even if we were to accept the infallible primacy of consensus, climate McCarthyists would still be in an embarrassing predicament.

Continue reading “John Kerry’s Climate McCarthyism Demeans Science” »

GD Star Rating

New Global Warming Report a Disgrace

article-2420783-1BD2956A000005DC-553_634x376source: PJMedia

The report “Climate Change: Evidence & Causes,” which was released on Thursday by the Royal Society (RS) and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS), does a serious disservice to science and society. Rather than using the conditional language of real science, it engages in what amounts to propaganda, making absolute assertions concerning topics about which we have little knowledge.

For example, the report proclaims, “Continued emissions of these gases [carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases] will cause further climate change, including substantial increases in global average surface temperature and important changes in regional climate.”

Not “may cause,” or even “probably cause,” but “will cause.” This is not the language of science. While it is common to see such absolute, one-sided assertions from totalitarian regimes trying to sway public opinion, it is appalling that two of the world’s foremost science bodies should engage in such unconditional rhetoric. Sir Isaac Newton, the Royal Society’s most famous member and its president until 1727, would be furious about such a violation of the scientific tradition he cherished.

Continue reading “New Global Warming Report a Disgrace” »

GD Star Rating

Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific evidence of man-made global warming

Greenpeace USA protest in rubber boats against test navigation of the 189,000 DWT Supertanker San Diego at Puget Sound, defying the Coast Guard ban for spectators.source: Daily Caller

There is no scientific evidence that human activity is causing the planet to warm, according to Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore, who testified in front of a Senate committee on Tuesday.

Moore argued that the current argument that the burning of fossil fuels is driving global warming over the past century lacks scientific evidence. He added that the Earth is in an unusually cold period and some warming would be a good thing.

“There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years,” according to Moore’s prepared testimony. “Today, we live in an unusually cold period in the history of life on earth and there is no reason to believe that a warmer climate would be anything but beneficial for humans and the majority of other species.”

“It is important to recognize, in the face of dire predictions about a [two degrees Celsius] rise in global average temperature, that humans are a tropical species,” Moore said. “We evolved at the equator in a climate where freezing weather did not exist. The only reasons we can survive these cold climates are fire, clothing, and housing.”

Continue reading “Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific evidence of man-made global warming” »

GD Star Rating